I would hesitate to say that Breaking the Spell is, in this sense, entirely absurd, as I doubt that it is tightly reasoned enough to merit the description. What does seem clear, however, is that, in its general form, the book's argument is one that strives (not always successfully) to preserve the shape of reason, logic, and method, even though that shape has been largely evacuated of all rational, logical, or empirical content. To put the matter bluntly, no one could mistake it for a genuinely substantial argument who was not firmly intent on doing so before ever reading the book.
Monday, April 4, 2011
Daniel Dennett Hunts the Snark
Wow a long review of Daniel Dennetts book, Breaking the Spell:Article | First Things:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment