So why is it acceptable to interpret the text in light of perceived scientific criterion and conclusions in one place (i.e., Gen 1 & 2) and not in other places like the Gospels and their empty tomb? In other words, what will happen when Biologos eventually gets around to dealing with the resurrection? You don’t have to be a scientist to see their inconsistency or suspect that their methods are bankrupt.
Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Should we declare bankruptcy on matters of “science”?
Adam and Eve, now with more Science. What about the resurrection?: Should we declare bankruptcy on matters of “science”? « Expository Thoughts:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment