So substitution is not a “theory of the atonement.” Nor is it even an additional image to take its place as an option alongside the others. It is rather the essence of each image and the heart of the atonement itself. None of the four images could stand without it. I am not of course saying that it is necessary to understand, let alone articulate, a substitutionary atonement before one can be saved. Yet the responsibility of Christian teachers, preachers and other witnesses is to seek grace to expound it with clarity and conviction. For the better people understand the glory of the divine substitution, the easier it will be for them to trust in the Substitute.
Monday, August 1, 2011
Stott: Substitution is Not a “Theory of the Atonement”
A good quote by John Stott on the atonement: Stott: Substitution is Not a “Theory of the Atonement” – Kevin DeYoung:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment